THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM IN THE MID EAST:
Part II
WHY JUDEO-CHRISTIANS SUPPORT WAR by C. E. CarlsonThe French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America when he traveled here in the first third of the 19th Century. In ringing tones he sang the praises of America’s invulnerable strength and spirit. He attributed its greatness to its citizens’ sense of morality… even with the abundant church attendances he observed in America. De Tocqueville wrote in French and is credited with this familiar quote: AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, AND IF AMERICA EVER CEASES TO BE GOOD, SHE WILL CEASE TO BE GREAT.
De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have known in 1830 that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its churches and the very sense of morality that he extolled.
First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful young nation in its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to commence near the turn of the 20th century. This was the onset of an attack on American Christianity that continues unabated against the traditional, Christ-following church. This attack, which author Gordon Ginn calls “The final Apostasy,” began with a small very wealthy and determined European political movement. It had a dream, and the American churches stood in its way.
The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves, had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. Not any land would do. World Zionists wanted a specific property that American Christians called “the Holy Land.” But if these Zionists read “Democracy in America” or any of the journals of any of America’s churches, which no doubt they did, they could not help but know that Jerusalem was not theirs to have. As self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the Christian New Testament, the persecutors of Christ and most of his early followers, and the engineers of his crucifixion. America’s traditional churches in the 19th Century would never stand for a Jewish occupation of Jesus’ homeland.
World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A much larger tool was a venerable, world respected European book publisher–The Oxford University Press.
The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield’s role was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible, and with limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling “bible” in America and has remained so for 90 years.
The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation, subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded authors of World Zionism.
Scofield’s support came from a movement that took root around the turn of the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of these “reformers” were later to serve on Scofield’s Editorial Committee.
Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and
rapturists, most of whose credibility fizzled over their faulty end times
prophesies. His mentor was one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was
associated with the Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical
trips to the US selling what is today called “Darbyism.” It is from Darby that
Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist theology, which he
later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible. It is possible
that Scofield’s interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford University Press, for
Darby was known to Oxford University. A History of The Plymouth Brethern By
William Blair Neatby, M.A.
The Oxford University Press owned “The
Scofield Reference Bible” from the beginning, as indicated by its copyright,
and Scofield stated he received handsome royalties from Oxford. Oxford’s
advertisers and promoters succeeded in making Scofield’s bible, with its
Christian Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting scripture in
Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It has been
published in at least four editions since its introduction in 1908 and remains
one of the largest selling Bibles ever.
The Scofield Reference Bible and its several
clones is all but worshiped in the ranks of celebrity Christians, beginning
with the first media icon, evangelist Billy Graham. Of particular importance to
the Zionist penetration of American Christian churches has been the fast growth
of national bible study organizations, such as Bible Study Fellowship and
Precept Ministries. These draw millions of students from not only evangelical
fundamentalist churches, but also from Catholic and mainline Protestant
churches and non-church contacts. These invariably teach forms of
“dispensationalism,” which draw their theory, to various degrees, from the
notes in the Oxford Bible.
Among more traditional churches that
encourage, and in some cases recommend, the use of the Scofield Reference Bible
is the huge Southern Baptist Convention of America, whose capture is World
Zionism’s crowning achievement. Our report on Southern Baptist Zionism,
entitled “The Cause of the Conflict: Fixing Blame.
Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be
the product of Darby and others, wisely chose not to change the text of the
King James Edition. Instead, he added hundreds of easy-to-read footnotes at the
bottom of about half of the pages, and as the Old English grammar of the KJE
becomes increasingly difficult for progressive generations of readers, students
become increasingly dependent on the modern language footnotes.
Scofield’s notes weave parts of the Old and
New Testaments together as though all were written at the same time by the same
people. This is a favorite device of modern dispensationalists who essentially
weigh all scripture against the unspoken and preposterous theory that the older
it is, the more authoritative. In many cases the Oxford references prove to be
puzzling rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply diversions. Scofield’s borrowed
ideas were later popularized under the labels and definitions that have evolved
into common usage today–”pre-millennialism,” “dispensationalism,”
“Judeo-Christianity,” and most recently the highly political movement openly
called “Christian Zionism.”
Thanks to the work of a few dedicated
researchers, much of the questionable personal history of Cyrus I. Scofield is
available. It reveals he was not a Bible scholar as one might expect, but a
political animal with the charm and talent for self-promotion of a Bill
Clinton. Scofield’s background reveals a criminal history, a deserted wife, a
wrecked family, and a penchant for self-serving lies. He was exactly the sort
of man the World Zionists might hire to bend Christian thought–a controllable
man and one capable of carrying the secret to his grave. (See The Incredible
Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield).
Other researchers have examined Scofield’s
eschatology and exposed his original work as apostate and heretic to
traditional Christian views. Among these is a massive work by Stephen Sizer
entitled Christian Zionism, Its History, Theology and Politics, Christ Church
Vicarage, Virginia Water, GU25 4LD, England
We Hold These Truths is grateful to these
dedicated researchers. Our own examination of the Oxford Bible has gone in
another direction, focusing not on what Scofield wrote, but on some of the many
additions and deletions The Oxford University Press has continued to make to
Scofield Reference Bible since his death in 1921. These alterations have
further radicalized the Scofield Bible into a manual for the Christian worship
of the State of Israel beyond what Schofield would have dreamed of. This
un-Christian anti-Arab theology has permitted the theft of Palestine and 54
years of death and destruction against the Palestinians, with hardly a
complaint from the Judeo-Christian mass media evangelists or most other
American church leaders. We thank God for the exceptions.
It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967
Oxford 4th Edition deifies–makes a God of–the State of Israel, a state that did
not even exist when Scofield wrote the original footnotes in 1908. This writer
believes that, had it not been for misguided anti-Arab race hatred promoted by
Christian Zionist leaders in America, neither the Gulf War nor the Israeli war
against the Palestinians would have occurred, and a million or more people who
have perished would be alive today.
What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World
Zionism in a scheme to control Christianity? For proof we offer the words
themselves that were planted in the 1967 Edition, 20 years after the State of
Israel was created in 1947, and 46 years after Scofield’s death. The words tell
us that those who control the Oxford Press recreated a bible to misguide
Christians and sell flaming Zionism in the churches of America.
There is little reason to believe that
Scofield knew or cared much about the Zionist movement, but at some point, he
became involved in a close and secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a
New York lawyer whose firm still exists today and one of the wealthiest and
most powerful World Zionists in America. Untermeyer controlled the unbreakable
thread that connected him with Scofield. They shared a password and a common
watering hole–and it appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who provided
the money that Scofield himself lacked. Scofield’s success as an international
bible editor without portfolio and his lavish living in Europe could only have
been accomplished with financial aid and international influence.
This connection might have remained hidden,
were it not for the work of Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who
discovered clues to the thread in Scofield family papers. But even had the
threads connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it
would still be obvious that that connection was there. It is significant that
Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after Scofield’s death, Oxford
accelerated changes to it. Since the death of its original author and namesake,
The Scofield Reference Bible has gone through several editions. Massive
pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield’s most
significant notes from the original editions were removed where they apparently
failed to further Zionist aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title,
“The New Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield.” It’s
anti-Arab, Christian subculture theology has made an enormous contribution to
war, turning Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in the
latter half of the 20th century.
The most convincing evidence of the unseen
Zionist hand that wrote the Scofield notes to the venerable King James Bible is
the content of the notes themselves, for only Zionists could have written them.
These notes are the subject of this paper.
Oxford edited the former 1945 Edition of SRB
in 1967, at the time of the Six Day War when Israel occupied Palestine. The new
footnotes to the King James Bible presumptuously granted the rights to the
Palestinians’ land to the State of Israel and specifically denied the Arab
Palestinians any such rights at all. One of the most brazen and outrageous of
these NEWLY INSERTED footnotes states:
“FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF
ANTI-SEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE JUDGMENT.” (page 19-20, footnote (3) to Genesis
12:3.) (our emphasis added)
This statement sounds like something from Ariel
Sharon, or the Chief Rabbi in Tel Aviv, or Theodore Herzl, the founder of
Modern Zionism. But these exact words are found between the covers of the 1967
Edition of the Oxford Bible that is followed by millions of American
churchgoers and students and is used by their leaders as a source for their
preaching and teaching.
There is no word for “anti-Semitism” in the
New Testament, nor is it found among the Ten Commandments. “Sin,” this writer
was taught, is a personal concept. It is something done by individuals in
conflict with God’s words, not by “nations.” Even Sodom did not sin–its people
did. The word “judgment” in the Bible always refers to God’s action. In the
Christian New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and salvation for
believing individuals, not for “nations.”
There was also no “State of Israel” when
Scofield wrote his original notes in his concocted Scofield Reference Bible in
1908. All references to Israel as a state were added AFTER 1947, when Israel
was granted statehood by edict of the United Nations. The Oxford University
Press simply rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in 1967 to make
antipathy toward the “State of Israel” a “sin.” Israel is made a god to be
worshiped, not merely a “state.” David Ben-Gurion could not have written it
better. Perhaps he did write it!
The Oxford 1967 Edition continues on page 19:
“(2) GOD MADE AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE OF
BLESSINGS THROUGH ABRAM’S SEED (a) TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL TO INHERIT A
SPECIFIC TERRITORY FOREVER”
“(3) THERE IS A PROMISE OF BLESSING UPON THOSE
INDIVIDUALS AND NATIONS WHO BLESS ABRAM’S DESCENDANTS, AND A CURSE LAID UPON
THOSE WHO PERSECUTE THE JEWS.” (Page 19, 1967 Edition Genesis 12:1-3)
This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy
that never occurs in the Bible itself:
“IT HAS INVARIABLY FARED ILL WITH THE PEOPLE
WHO HAVE PERSECUTED THE JEW, WELL WITH THOSE WHO HAVE PROTECTED HIM.” and “THE
FUTURE WILL STILL MORE REMARKABLY PROVE THIS PRINCIPLE”(footnote (3) bottom of
page19-20Genesis 12:3)
None of these notes appeared in the original
Scofield Reference Bible or in the 1917 or 1945 editions. The state of Israel
DID NOT EXIST in 1945, and according to the best dictionaries of the time, the
word “Israel” only referred to a particular man and an ancient tribe, which is
consistent with the Bible text. See “Israel,” Webster’s New International
Dictionary 2nd (1950) Edition.
All of this language, including the prophecy
about the future being really bad for those who “persecute the Jews,” reflects
and furthers the goals of the Anti-Defamation League, which has a stated goal
of creating an environment where opposing the State of Israel is considered
“anti-Semitism,” and “anti-Semitism” is a “hate crime” punishable by law. This
dream has become a reality in the Christian Zionist churches of America. Only
someone with these goals could have written this footnote.
The State of Israel’s legal claims to Arab
lands are based on the United Nations Partitioning Agreement of 1947, which
gave the Jews only a fraction of the land they have since occupied by force.
But when this author went to Israel and asked various Israelis where they got
the right to occupy Palestine, each invariably said words to the effect that
“God gave it to us.” This interpretation of Hebrew scripture stems from the
book of Genesis and is called the “Abrahamic Covenant”. It is repeated several
times and begins with God’s promise to a man called Abraham who was eventually
to become the grandfather of a man called “Israel:”
“[2] AND I WILL MAKE OF THEE A GREAT NATION,
AND I WILL BLESS THEE, AND MAKE THY NAME GREAT; AND THOU SHALL BE A BLESSING:”
“[3] AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS THEE,
AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSETH THEE: AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE
BLESSED.” Genesis 12:3, King James Edition.
It is upon this promise to a single person
that modern Israeli Zionists base their claims to what amounts to the entire
Mid-East. Its logic is roughly the equivalent of someone claiming to be the
heir to the John Paul Getty estate because the great man had once sent a letter
to someone’s cousin seven times removed containing the salutation “wishing you
my very best.” In “Sherry’s War,” We Hold These Truths provides a common sense
discussion of the Abrahamic Covenant and how millions of Christians are taught
to misunderstand it.
It is tempting to engage in academic arguments
to show readers the lack of logic in Scofield’s theology, which has led
followers of Christ so far astray. It seems all too easy to refute the various
Bible references given in support of Scofield’s strange writings. But we will
resist the temptation to do this, because others have already done it quite
well, and more importantly because it leads us off our course.
It is also inviting to dig into Scofield’s
sordid past as Canfield has done, revealing him to be a convicted felon and
probable pathological liar, but we leave that to others, because our interest
is not in Scofield’s life, but in saving the lives of millions of innocent
people who are threatened by the continuing Zionist push for perpetual war.
Instead, we will examine the words on their
face. The words in these 1967 footnotes are Zionist propaganda that has been
tacked onto the text of a Christian Bible. Most of them make no sense, except
to support the Zionist State of Israel in its war against the Palestinians and
any other wars it may enter into. In this purpose, Zionism has completely
succeeded. American Judeo-Christians, more recently labeled “Christian
Zionists,” have remained mute during wars upon Israel’s enemies in Palestine,
Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and elsewhere. It is past time to stop the spilling
of more blood, some of it Christian blood.
Now, for evidence of the intent of the
Zionists deception of Christians, let us examine some Scofield’s notes THAT
HAVE BEEN ALTERED OR REMOVED by Oxford after his death. In 1908 Scofield wrote
in 1908:
“THE CONTRAST, ‘I KNOW THAT YE ARE ABRAHAM’S
SEED’ – ‘IF YE WERE ABRAHAM’S CHILDREN’ IS THAT BETWEEN THE NATURAL AND THE
SPIRITUAL POSTERITY OF ABRAHAM. THE ISRAELITISH PEOPLE AND ISHMAELITISH PEOPLE
ARE THE FORMER; ALL WHO ARE ‘OF THE PRECIOUS FAITH WITH ABRAHAM,’ WHETHER JEWS
OR GENTILES, ARE THE LATTER (ROM 9, 6-8; GAL, 4-14. SEE ‘ABRAHAMIC COVENANT’
GEN 15, 18, NOTE).” ( Scofield’s 1945 page 1127, note to John 8:39)
Compare that with the Oxford note substituted
in the 1967 Edition:
“8:37 ALL JEWS ARE NATURAL DESCENDANTS OF
ABRAHAM, BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY HIS SPIRITUAL POSTERITY, CP Rom 9-6-8, Gal 3:
6-14″ (Note (1) P1136, Oxford 1967 Edition, note to Jn 8:37.)
How, pray tell, can “all Jews” be “natural
descendants of Abraham,” a Chaldean who lived some 3000 years ago? Persons of
all races are Jews and new Jews are being converted every day from every race.
One might as well say all Lutherans are the natural descendants of Martin
Luther; or that all Baptists come from the loins of John the Baptist. This note
could only have been written by an Israeli patriot, for no one else would have
a vested interest in promoting this genetic nonsense. Shame on those who accept
this racism; it is apostate Christianity.
The original Scofield note was far out of line
with traditional Christianity in 1908 and should have been treated as heresy
then. Yet Scofield had failed to go far enough for the Zionists. Scofield
clearly recognized what the book of Genesis states, that the sons of Ishmael
are co-heirs to Abraham’s ancient promise. Did not Scofield say “the
Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people are…the natural posterity of
Abraham”? The Oxford Press simply waited for Scofield to die and changed it as
they wished.
And what is it that Scofield said that did not
satisfy the Zionists who rewrote the Oxford 1967 Edition?
The answer is an easy one. Most Arab and
Islamic scholars consider Arabs in general and the Prophet Mohamed in
particular to be direct descendants of Ishmael, Abraham’s first son and older
half-brother of Isaac, whose son Jacob was later to become known as “Israel.”
Many Arabs believe that through Ishmael they are co-heirs of to Abraham’s
promise, and they correctly believe that present-day Israelis have no Biblical
right to steal their land. Jewish Talmudic folklore also speaks of Ishmael, so
the Zionists apparently felt they had to alter how Christians viewed the two
half brothers in order to prevent Christians from siding with the Arabs over
the land theft.
The Zionists solved this dilemma by inserting
a senseless footnote in the 1967 (Oxford) Scofield Reference Bible which, in
effect, substitutes the word “Jews” for the words “The Israelitish people and
Ishmaelitish people,” as Scofield originally wrote it. The Israelitish and
Ishmaelitish people lived 3000 years ago, but the Zionists want to claim the
Arabs’ part of the presumed birthright right now! Read it again; “all Jews are
natural descendants of Abraham, but are not necessarily his spiritual
posterity.”
And there is more of such boondogglery in the
Oxford bible. On the same page 1137 we find yet another brand new
Zionist-friendly note referring to the New Testament book of John 8:37.
“(2) 8:44 THAT THIS SATANIC FATHERHOOD CANNOT
BE LIMITED TO THE PHARISEES IS MADE CLEAR IN 1Jn3:8-10″ (note SRB 1967 Edition,
P1137 to John 8:44)
Let us look at the verse Oxford is trying to
soften, wherein Jesus is speaking directly to the Pharisees, who were the
Jewish leaders of his day, and to no one else:
“YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, AND THE LUST
OF YOUR FATHER YE WILL DO. HE WAS A MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, AND ABODE NOT
IN THE TRUTH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. WHEN HE SPEAKEST A LIE, HE
SPEAKEST OF HIS OWN; FOR HE IS A LIAR, AND THE FATHER OF IT.” John 8:44 King
James Ed.)
Those are plain words. No wonder the Zionists
wanted to dilute what Jesus said. Not only did Oxford add a new footnote in
1967, but they inserted no less than four reference cues into the King James
sacred text, directing readers to their specious, apostate footnotes. It seems
the Zionists cannot deny what Jesus said about Pharisees, but they do not want
to bear the burden of being “sons of Satan” all by themselves. Now here’s the
text of the verse to which Oxford refers in order to try to solve this problem:
“HE THAT COMMITETH SIN IS OF THE DEVIL; FOR
THE DEVIL SINNETH FROM THE BEGINNING. FOR THIS PURPOSE THE SON OF GOD WAS
MANIFESTED, THAT HE MIGHT DESTROY THE WORK OF THE DEVIL.” (1Jn3:8.King James
Edition)
Fine, but this verse, spoken by Jesus to His
followers in a speech about avoiding sin, in no way supports Oxford’s argument
that Jesus was not talking directly to and about the Pharisee leaders when he
called them “Sons of Satan” in John 8:44. It is a different book written at a
different time to a different audience. This is typical Christian Zionist
diversion.
To find out to whom Jesus is speaking you must
read the rest of John 8, not something from another book. Furthermore, John 8:44
is only one of some 77 verses where Jesus confronted the Pharisees by name and
in many cases addressed them as “satanic” and as “vipers.” Oxford simply
ignores most of these denunciations by Jesus, adding no notes at all, and the
Christian Zionists go along without question.
These are a few examples of Zionist
perversions of scripture that have shaped the doctrine of America’s most
politically powerful religious subculture, the “Christian Zionists” as Ariel
Sharon calls them, or the dispensationalists, as intellectual followers call
themselves, or the Judeo-Christians as our politically-correct politicians
describe themselves. Today’s Mid-East wars are not caused by the predisposition
of the peoples, who are no more warlike than any human tribes. Without the
pandering to Jewish and Zionist interests that is carried out by this
subculture–the most vocal being the celebrity Christian evangelists–there would
be no such wars, for there is not enough support for war outside of organized
Zionist Christianity.
Reverend Stephen Sizer of Christ Church, Christ
Church Vicarage, Virginia Water, GU25 4LD, England is perhaps the most
dedicated new scholar writing about the Scofield Bible craze, popularly known
as Christian Zionism. He has quipped, “Judging Christianity by looking at the
American Evangelists is kind of like judging the British by watching Benny
Hill.”
Reverend Sizer’s
remark brings to mind another Benny; his name is Benny Hinn, not a British comic, but an American evangelist spouting
inflammatory hate-filled words aimed at Muslims everywhere. Hinn was speaking
to the applause of an aroused crowd of thousands in the American Airline Center
in Dallas when he shocked two Ft. Worth Star Telegram religious reporters
covering the July 3d event by announcing, “We are on God’s side,” speaking of
Palestine. He shouted, “This is not a war between Jews and Arabs.. It is a war
between God and the Devil.” Lest there be any doubt about it, Hinn was talking
about a blood war in which the Israelis are “God” and the Palestinians are “the
Devil.”
Benny Hinn is one of hundreds of acknowledged
Christian Zionists who have no problem spouting outright race hatred and who
join in unconditional support for Israel without regard for which or how many
of Israel’s enemies are killed or crippled. His boldness stems from his
knowledge that the vast majority of professing Christians from whom he seeks
his lavish support-the Judeo-Christians, or Christian Zionists–do not shrink at
his words, because they have been conditioned to accept them, just as Roman
citizens learned to accept Christian persecution, even burning alive, under
Nero. Several evangelists in attendance affirmed their agreement with Hinn –
“the line between Christians and Muslims is the difference between good and
evil.
An amazing number of professing Christians are
in agreement with the fanatical likes of Hinn, including Gary Bauer, Ralph
Reed, James Dobson and hundreds more. Yet Hinn’s profit-seeking fanaticism is
not as shocking as that of men like Richard Land of the Southern Baptist
Convention who occupy the highest positions in the area of conservative
religious thought. Land may have stopped short of branding all Muslims as
devils, but he attacked their leader and Prophet and stated that, according to
Baptist Bible interpretation, the Palestinian people have no legal rights to
property in Palestine. See our discussion of Southern Baptists entitled “The
Cause of the Conflict: Fixing Blame.”
The more politically conservative and
libertarian the speaker expressing hatred for Islam, the more shocking the
statement sounds. One example is Samuel Blumenfeld, a veteran textbook author
and advocate of home education. His attack on Islam in a story entitled
“Religion and Satanism” in the April 2002 conservative, Calvinist Chalcedon
Report leaves little room for civil liberties and freedom of thought. He
writes, “Islam is a religion ruled by Satan,” and asks, “Can anyone under the
influence of Satan be trusted?” Blumenfeld shows poor judgment and a lack of
morality when he allows phrases such as “willing agents of Satan,” “another
manifestation of Satanism” and “the willingness of Muslims to believe blatant
lies,” to spill from his pen.
How can anyone interpret these words by Land,
Hinn, Blumenfeld, and yes, our own President, as anything less than race
hatred? Who would make such generalized and transparently false statements
against any other minority except Muslims?
About 100 million American Christians need to
recover their true faith in Christ Jesus, who never denounced any individual on
account of his group. Jesus even tried to save the Pharisees, and only
denounced them when they showed themselves to be deceivers. There is not a word
in the New Testament that urges any follower of Jesus to murder one child in
Iraq or condemn Palestine to death. Race hatred is a Zionist, not a Christian,
strategy.Christian Zionism may be the most bloodthirsty apostasy in the entire history of Christianity or any other religion. Shame on its leaders: they have already brought the blood of untold numbers innocent people down upon the spires and prayer benches of America’s churches.
WHTT asks every Christian to share this article with pastors and church leaders, especially lay leaders. We ask every Muslim and Jew who reads it to do the same. You might wish to suspend giving money to any organizations that preach Zionist race hatred in any form, especially under the cover Jesus Christ. And lastly, We Hold These Truths invites your informed comments and questions.
Listen to: Kulture Klash II, How Oxford University Press and CI Scofield stole the Christian Bible, WHTT “Internet Talk Radio” – also available on tape.
Copyright 2002, may be reproduced in full with
permission.
We Hold These Truths (WHTT)P.O. Box 14491
Scottsdale, AZ 85267
480-947-3329
Resources:
The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph
M. Canfield, hard cover, $30.00 ppd. (limited availability).
Listen to: Kulture Klash I and II, Audio tape
set, How Oxford University Press and CI Scofield stole the Christian Bible. CE
Carlson and WHTT Advisors: $15.00 ppd
Sherry’s War: Twenty page research paper plus
1 hour audiotape by C. E. Carlson, – How Judeo-Christians mix and match
scripture verses and use of extra text out of context to promote the Pop
Church’s “chosen people” and end times scenario. Sherry and many other
well-meaning, professed Christians have justified war against Arab people
without a scrap of scriptural support and with little knowledge of the
conflict. “Sherry’s War” offers insight into current Christian sub-culture and
why many have justified or ignored the brutal assassinations of Islamic peoples
simply because they are not Israelis or Christian. An introduction to WHTT’s
classic 20-page study by the same name; see Right To The Point Journal. Both
$15.00 ppd.
The Final Apostasy – by Gordon Ginn Ph.D. Is
your church apostate, would you know it if it were? A book that reveals the
untold historical and documented ex-post facto changes made in the Hebrew text
of the Old Testament…after Christ. These changes have affected what all of us
believe, from the Reformation to Day911. Ginn sheds light on the turmoil in the
Middle East and reveals the results of some Christians’ tragic errors in
accepting the “Final Apostasy”. 218 pages $20.ppd.
All of the above items at one time $70.00
(call or mail for now, please.)
We Hold These TruthsP.O. Box 14491
Scottsdale, AZ 85267
480-947-3329
